Guest column submitted by U.S. Senator Mike Crapo
President Biden has hit the campaign trail touting the so-called victories of “Bidenomics.” However, for most Idahoans, Bidenomics has meant record-high grocery bills, soaring housing costs, a $33 trillion national debt and a higher tax burden. Despite these negative economic conditions, the Administration is steadfast in its campaign to convince low- and middle-income taxpayers that this economy is working for them. But, the facts do not support the spin. Take, for example, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s directive that tax audits will not increase on households making under $400,000 annually. Beneath the comforting simplicity of this directive lurk questionable details raising concerns as to how it may affect Idahoans and all American taxpayers.
This includes, what does “making under $400,000” truly mean? When my Republican colleagues and I asked IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel, he responded that audit rates would be tentatively benchmarked to audits for 2018 tax filings and the income threshold would be $400,000 of “total positive income” (TPI). Unfortunately, Commissioner Werfel’s answers create more questions. To most Americans, what they “make” means what they take home after paying expenses and incurring losses. But, TPI is defined by the IRS as “the sum of all positive amounts shown for the various sources of income reported on the individual tax return, and losses are treated as $0.”
This could impact many taxpayers who in reality make far less than $400,000. How would this affect an Idaho small business owner whose gross sales generate more than $400,000, but after expenses and losses, takes home much less? TPI appears to be an extremely broad measure that will catch many unsuspecting taxpayers in the IRS’s audit dragnet. This is not the only tax trap set by the directive. The directive also appears to include a marriage penalty, as the $400,000 threshold applies to a single individual, while couples must share it.
A closer examination of what freezing audits at the 2018 level means for taxpayers reveals more reason for concern.
The Administration’s $400,000 directive is not designed to just narrowly target “millionaires and billionaires.” Rather, the directive’s ambiguous wording would enable the IRS to target the largest part of the tax gap (the difference between taxes owed and taxes paid), underreporting by those making less than $400,000 a year.
I introduced legislation that would make the directive meaningful by replacing the ambiguous income standard and vague timeframe with a clear, taxable income standard effective during the ten years the IRS will spend its super-sized enforcement budget. Putting the Administration’s directive into law, in contrast to nonbinding statements of intention or unenforceable, vague Treasury Department edicts, will truly protect low- and middle-income taxpayers from the coming wave of IRS examinations.
# # #